2. What would you do if you had unlimited money and no obligations?
Probably most of the same things I do now. I'd live a simple, peaceful life. I'd read, write, walk, swim, make AI art, tinker, travel, date, and spend time with family and friends.
The only big difference is that I'd buy a plot of land and put a mobile home on it.
3. What would you do if you were immortal and had eternal youth?
I'd go to Mars to help build a settlement there. Maybe every few decades, I'd head back to earth for a vacation.
Speaking of space colonization, it's a terrible idea for many reasons. The money and effort would be better used making sure civilization survives on earth for thousands of years to come. 99% of species go extinct within 15 million years.
Often, actions that are politically feasible won't help, and actions that would help are too unpopular to be politically feasible.
So in order to get anywhere, politicians have practice strategic hypocrisy: promise a popular policy and then implement the unpopular one. It's like putting pet medicine in a piece of cheese to get a dog to swallow it.
As a public service, below are some of my suggestions on how to sell necessary but unpopular policies.
Measure: repeal the minimum wage
Slogan: Maximizing Employment Act
Measure: school vouchers
Slogan: Helping Our Teachers Act
Measure: abolish the income tax
Slogan: Fairness for Working Families Act
The magic words are: children, families, working, freedom, teachers, defense, security, fair, smart, care
There is black on white homicide almost every day in the US, but unless it's particularly heinous (such as the Metcalf stabbing with many witnesses or the Zarutska stabbing caught on video), it rarely makes the national news. What does often make the national news are police killings of black Americans and white on black homicides.
20 black-on-white homicides found in June, 2026 — 22 total, including updates, by Kenn Gividen - The Unz Review
Most journalists in the US are liberal and use their jobs to push the agenda of the Democratic Party. Among other things, this involves stoking black resentment against whites whenever possible. The Democratic Party styles itself as the protector of minorities, so they do their best to frighten them with stories of oppression in order to get their votes. Their propaganda works.
The man who wrote the article below ended up getting fired, but it makes for entertaining reading. The gist is to stay away from American blacks unless you know them personally.
YouTube is now filled with videos from police cameras showing the reality of crime in the US. Here is a simple traffic stop that escalated into a high-speed chase and a fatal car crash, all because the driver and occupants refused to follow simple and lawful commands.
The bottom line is that black Americans commit more crime. That's why they have more interactions with the police and why more of them end up in prison. Denying this reality does no good.
White Americans are taught early on that racism is bad, and the vast majority believe that it is. It's easier to find white Americans who believe the earth is flat than truly believe blacks are an inferior race.
There's selection bias since people choose to join Mensa. It says the US Mensa group has about 40,000 members. It has breakdowns for education, age, and gender, but nothing about race or ethnicity. The relationship between IQ and race has been a taboo topic for a long time.
Over at BET (Black Entertainment Television) they say the US Mensa group has 57,000 members and
362 are black. I'm not sure how BET got this information. Mensa must keep track and provides such info for a fee.
If we work from the oft-cited figure that black Americans have an average IQ of 85, about 1% will have IQs of 130 and above. And given that black Americans are about 12% of the population, they will be less than 1% of Americans who have IQs over 130.
math breakdown
Standard deviation is 15, 130 is 3 standard deviations above. 99.7% of data in a bell curve is within 3 standard deviations of the mean. 1 - 0.997 = 0.003. 0.003/2 = 0.0015 or 0.15%
362/57000 = 0.0063 or 0.63%
This suggests that a higher percent of black people with IQs over 130 join Mensa as compared to whites.
In the US, this refers to children with IQs 130 or higher. They are in the top 2% for intelligence and do best with self-directed learning.
Places to take them: above all, libraries. After that, museums, zoos, aquariums, planetariums, and escape rooms. Regular weekend trips should be enough. If they can volunteer at these places or partner with a mentor there, they should.
If they're in public school, they should try to skip grades and graduate early. Schools are designed around an IQ range of 85 to 115.
Set a limit of about an hour of reading per day. One movie per day is acceptable. An hour of TV and video game time per day is reasonable. That covers about four hours.
Ideally, they should have some project they are working on that takes up most of their time during the day. This can include gardening, painting, drawing, writing, playing music, building models, solving puzzles, science experiments, or playing chess. Fours per day during the week should be enough.
Intellectual children often lack physical fitness. Running, swimming, weightlifting, and martial arts can counteract this. Scouting and 4H are great places for such children to socialize. If nothing else, long walks and bike rides build endurance and resilience.
It's very easy to get such children to do chores if you pay them. They should start working part-time as soon as they can.
They should conceal their intelligence, follow their passions, and take the path of least resistance.
I hope to have kids someday and ideally homeschool them with the help of a stay-at-home mom. It probably won't work out that way, but it's useful to consider the ideal case. Kids should help with cooking and cleaning. Actual school would last six hours with 30 minutes each for 12 periods:
1. copying dictionary (for handwriting, spelling, vocabulary, and reading comprehension)
2. reading the Bible (for moral instruction, cultural awareness, and reading comprehension)
The so-called blue zones are locations where most people live long with good health.
***
The Blue Zones are regions in the world where people live significantly longer and healthier lives. The five official Blue Zones are:
Okinawa, Japan: Known for its high number of centenarians and a diet rich in vegetables and tofu.
Sardinia, Italy: Features a strong community and a diet high in whole grains and healthy fats.
Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica: Residents have a strong sense of purpose and a diet rich in beans and corn.
Ikaria, Greece: Known for its Mediterranean diet and active lifestyle, leading to low rates of dementia.
Loma Linda, California, USA: Home to a community of Seventh-day Adventists who follow a plant-based diet and prioritize health
***
A factor overlooked is that all these places are extremely homogenous. Being around people who are similarly to you lowers stress and fosters strong relationships.
Vegetables, seafood, swimming, moderate climate, exercise, no tobacco, moderate alcohol - yes, these are all important. Community and a sense of identity is also important.
After scanning the entire United States, the researchers found that Manassas Park, Virginia, a city of roughly 17,000 located 30 miles southwest of Washington, D.C., and Weld County, Colorado, a metropolitan area just north of Denver that’s home to 378,000 people, ranked highest with life expectancies of 96-years-old.
Black folks in those communities are living well past the national average of 74-years-old.
The same can be said for Loudoun, Fairfax, Prince William, and Montgomery counties in Virginia — all located outside of Washington, D.C. — where Black residents are living up to 82-years-old, on average.
Coined as “Chocolate City,” D.C. has historically had a large Black population — making up 45% of the district’s population as of 2021.
“If there is a Wakanda in the United States, it’s the DMV,” or the District of Columbia-Maryland-Virginia corridor, Perry says.
“You have places in Maryland and Virginia, in particular, where Black people are thriving. They’re walking around with Air Jordans. They got the nice, fancy job. They own the homes. They’re living the life, and they’re living longer,” he says.
***
The DC metro area is about twice black as the US average (24% vs 12%).
This poster makes whiteness look like a great thing, which is not what the creators intended. It was displayed in the Smithsonian, America's foremost museum.
Scientific method, work hard, plan for the future, steak and potatoes, be polite - that all sounds pretty good to me. It probably sounds good to many people who aren't white.
What the hell were the people who made this thinking?
It turns out the poster was based on the work of Ibram X. Kendi, who refers to himself as an antiracist. In practice, this means constantly complaining about white people. According to him, it is not enough to merely not be racist. To be truly virtuous, you must be antiracist.
And I mean all of them- ancient, Confederate, Communist, whatever. They're works of art. I strongly oppose communism, but even ex Eastern Bloc countries have left many standing for educational and artistic value.
The philosophy behind these monuments is best described by one of their most famous architects Bogdan Bogdanović: "While I built them, I wished for a world without monuments. It seems that these people are created to suffer, and new generations complicate that suffering further. Monuments to suffering are dishonest, often stupid and comical. They explain nothing and call for nothing. Philosophical and metaphysical ideas don't need matter. Every monument is a little bit aggressive, and the memories it evokes are always dangerous. The world without history is truly impossible, but we should build a history of intelligence, ideas and sensations, not of overpowering. But it seems that is just my wishful thinking."
There are a number of trends that overlap with low fertility in the industrialized world.
In China, Japan, and South Korea, children are pushed very hard in school, often to the point that they have very little time to socialize. This contributes to increased suicide and makes it harder for young people to form relationships.
In China, it is a common practice to hook kids up to IV drips so they can spend more time doing homework.
In Europe and North America, declining church attendance means young people are less likely to form relationships with peers who share their values. This increases loneliness and means fewer marriages and friendships.
Also in Europe and North America, fewer people are getting married to people they meet at work. Work used to be one of the main places people found their spouses. The other two places were school and church.
Any civilization that doesn't reproduce enough is a just few generations from extinction. Family formation is the key to the long-term survival of groups.
In India, Africa, and the Islamic world, arranged marriages are common, and so the fertility rate remains high. Matchmakers are also prevalent in Asia and the Islamic world.
Of the 30 countries with the highest fertility, 28 are in Africa and the other two are Yemen and Afghanistan. What do these countries have in common? Well, they are poor, are very religious (Christianity or Islam), and the women there often get married young. Chad, which has the world's highest birthrate, is about evenly split between Christians and Muslims.
In North America, the white groups with the highest fertility are the Amish and the Mormons (LDS). They are both patriarchal and highly religious.
Feminism, birth control, pornography, prostitution, and abortion are much more common in the industrialized world. They are linked by the idea of sexual permissiveness.
So what conclusions can we draw and what solutions can be implemented? I see it this way:
1. Most people, but especially women, should stop going to school after the 8th grade.
2. Enough cheap housing needs to be built. This point bears repeating.
3. Traditional and patriarchal views should be tolerated rather than suppressed.
4. More teachers should be men. They are better at instilling discipline and learning.
5. Abortion should be limited to cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. Currently, about 85% of abortions are for other reasons.
Since I'm an American, I'm mostly thinking about what my country needs to do to get back on the right path. In 1960, the median age at first marriage was 23 for men and 20 for women. The fertility rate in the same year was 3.65, which is about the same as Guinea-Bissau today.
The US has slight population growth only because of very high rates of immigration, which is not sustainable. America's cultures and institutions won't survive if the racial and ethnic composition changes too much from what it was in 1960. The current composition is acceptable, but a larger white majority would be better.
America has a long history of trying to integrate various groups with the white majority, and the results have been mixed at best. The main groups have been the people of the various native tribes, blacks, and Mexicans. History shows America does best when it has a large white majority, such as during the Roaring Twenties and the postwar Baby Boom era.
Jared Taylor gave a good speech on the ongoing failure of multiculturalism in America since 1607. It was banned in Paris.
America's freedom and success come from individualism. America is an individualistic country because whites on average are more individualistic than other races. It's hard to herd cats, but amazing things happen when you do. Note the race of the people in the following video:
1969 was the peak of space travel and aerospace technology. Back then, the country was 88% white and 11% black. The median age at first marriage the same year was 20 for women and 22 for men. The fertility rate was 2.43.
Every industrialized country besides Israel has below replacement fertility. Here are some suggestions for fixing that.
-build cheap housing
A house is the most expensive thing most people will ever buy, and usually they won't have kids until they can afford one.
-end no fault divorce
In the days of yore, divorces were rarely granted, and the petitioner had to prove abuse, adultery, abandonment or some other serious defect. In the US, 40% of marriages end in divorce, and 70% of them are initiated by women. Divorce is often financially and emotionally catastrophic for men.
-end government student loans
Most college students are wasting their time and money, particularly women. The crushing student loan debt many men and women end up with is another obstacle to family formation.
Many people are wasting their time with online dating. I'm not sure how to fix that.
In the past, some countries experimented with taxing single people to encourage marriage. It didn't work.
The widespread availability of pornography has also discouraged men from seeking partners, though efforts to ban it won't work either.
The future looks painful for countries with fertility shortfalls.
Restricting abortion could help but is unlikely given voter preferences. Likewise, decreasing or abolishing government social spending would encourage women to form stable relationships.
Many moons ago, I wrote that the only things the US government needs to handle are nuclear deterrence and maintaining a stable currency. Perhaps some elaboration would be helpful. I don't expect any of the following to happen, but any of them would be a great improvement. So below in no particular order are changes I'd like to see
-end the income tax
It discourages work and enables wasteful government spending.
-cut about 90% of military spending and close overseas military bases
We have two big oceans to the east and west and friendly neighbors to the north and south.
-end the war on drugs
It's a gigantic, wasteful, hypocritical failure.
-end the Federal Reserve
It was created in 1913 to stabilize the economy and failed to stop the Great Depression in 1929.
-end foreign aid
The main result of American foreign aid besides enriching Israel has been a large and probably unsustainable increase in Africa's population.
-end Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid
They will bankrupt the country unless drastically reformed.
-return to the gold and/or silver standard
It's the only cure for inflation.
-secure the southern border
Build a wall and guard it with soldiers. Illegal immigration is an invasion.
-deport illegals
They don't belong here.
-end birthright citizenship
You're only an American if at least one of your parents is American.
-end any government agency that did not exist before 1900
This would disband most of the alphabet soup: EPA, FBI, CIA, NSA, NASA, TSA, DHS, etc.
-government land should be sold off
Loggers, ranchers, and others can manage it more effectively.
-end compulsory schooling
Let parents decide how to educate their kids.
-end the minimum wage
minimum wage = minimum jobs
-cancel all tariffs
Tariffs protect inefficient businesses and force consumers to pay more.
-build oil refineries and nuclear power plants
Nothing else will provide enough energy.
-trade and have normal diplomatic relations with all countries
Sanctions don't work.
-Withdraw from NATO.
Let Europe defend itself.
-stop funding the UN
We've already done our share by hosting the place.
-allow total freedom of association
If people want to discriminate, let them. Self-segregation is already the norm.
-build cheap housing
It will go a long way in encouraging a sufficient birth rate.
As countries and states become less white, they become poorer and more violent. Places that are majority white should stay that way to maintain their quality of life.
It's a great show I immensely enjoyed as a kid. I do hate their anti-nuclear propaganda. Earth to morons, flower power will not solve America's energy problems. Also, France gets 70% of its energy from nuclear plants, and they haven't started glowing in the dark.
In real life, there are far more deaths from coal mining and coal power plants than nuclear energy.
Not convinced? Galen Winsor, a former nuclear weapons engineer, ate uranium on camera to prove it's not nearly as dangerous as Hollywood or the government would have us believe:
The scientific and technological achievements of the US are not because the US has the best educational system, but because it attracts smart people from all over the world. Nuclear weapons and the moon landings were made possible by foreign-born scientists who came to America for a better life (freedom and prosperity).
In that case, the US should be spending less on education and more on recruiting talented foreigners. Good education can make smart people even smarter, but it can't turn average joes into geniuses. Unfortunately, the best evidence is that intelligence is mostly genetic.
Eugenics gets a bad rap for many reasons, yet sperm bank customers consistently demand donors with high IQs. Paying high-IQ men to donate sperm would be an easy way to increase the number of smart people. Mensa already has a database of such people.
There are many existing incentives that reward smart Americans such as scholarships, but these do not lead to smart people having more children.
More smart people = a better life for everyone. If it's not possible to breed more of them, the ones we have need to be kept alive, happy, and working.
There is evidence that certain unorthodox educational approaches can be helpful with low-performing groups. This Texas math teacher managed to boost test scores with rap:
1. The Arabs only need to defeat Israel once. Israel has to beat them every time. No country goes undefeated forever. Even the mighty British lost to Afghanistan and the US, which lost to Vietnam and Afghanistan. China lost to many countries during the Boxer Rebellion and later lost to Vietnam. Russia lost to Japan, then Germany in WW1, and later Afghanistan. Likewise, France, Germany, and Japan have lost major wars.
2. US support for Israel with steadily wane as its demographics change and whites become a minority. American support for Israel mainly comes from American Jews and white evangelicals.
3. If Israel stops building settlements and lifts the blockade of Gaza, there is a chance for lasting peace, or at least a long lull in the fighting.
4. Israel will always be surrounded by enemies. Its only hope for survival is to be self-sufficient and turn itself into a fortress.
5. International pressure ended apartheid in South Africa, and it could lead to a radical change in Israel's government.
6. Israel can't get lasting peace by annihilating its enemies or even soundly defeating them. The only reason there has been peace between Israel and Egypt is because Egypt recaptured the Sinai and inflicted heavy losses on Israel in 1973.
7. If Israel gets invaded and occupied, they will have to fight their way out with guerilla warfare as Vietnam and Afghanistan have done multiple times.
Intensive agriculture with fertilizer, pesticides, and machines has been slow to catch on in sub-Saharan Africa. This combined with high unemployment means a return to subsistence agriculture is likely in the long term if there is no other intervention.
The problem is traditional methods won't produce enough food to feed Africa's population. It seems the only options are increasing dependence on food aid and imports or letting disease, famine, and war restore the balance. There are 1.6 billion people in Africa now, but only 140 million when they were self-sufficient for food in 1900.
Alternatively, there could be a mass migration out of Africa, but most countries would be reluctant to accept large numbers of them.
Birth control could help, but it too has been slow to catch on, though there has been a gradual decline in fertility over the past century.
Another option would be to allow foreign farmers to buy land in Africa and raise crops. This would be unpopular, but it would solve the food shortage problem. Neocolonialism to the rescue?
China may become the star of neocolonialism. If Africans let them build infrastructure, they'd probably let them farm. China needs food imports and also has a large pool of unemployed young men. I can see Zimbabwe letting Chinese workers grow food on formerly white-owned farms. South Africa might do the same. The Chinese would have to hire enough Africans to sweeten the deal or provide some other incentive.
When I was in Tanzania, I saw that pretty much everyone was a farmer, and most were pretty good at it. I tried my hand at it but only succeeded in growing a small bunch of bananas. Hivyo ilivyo (that's the way it is).
1. There will be a gradual takeover of US cities by socialist mayors. Politics is downstream of culture which is downstream from demographics. The current trend is that people who vote socialist will become an increasingly large share of the population. Currently, of 100 largest US cities, only 22 have Republican mayors. Of the top 30, only 2 have Republican mayors, and both are in Texas (Dallas and Fort Worth).
2. Cities will be multiracial while suburbs and rural areas will become increasingly white. This means whites will be in control of the food and fuel, which gives them the upper hand in any future civil war.
They'll also have most of the guns and the most people with combat experience.
3. Spanish speakers will be a majority in many areas. This will force others to either learn it or move to an anglophone area.
4. By 2050, most of the retirees will be white and most of the workers non-white. Cuts to Social Security are inevitable.
5. Moderate to high inflation is inevitable, though there is a small chance of hyperinflation.
6. Overall, the country probably won't collapse of fall into civil war, but gradual balkanization is most likely outcome. India is a country of great diversity, but also poverty and tension. South Africa is very diverse, but also plagued by disease, poverty, and crime. The most likely fate of the US is that it will end up being somewhat like the way Brazil is today.
