Ronald Reagan switched from Democrat to Republican in 1962. Hillary Clinton was a member of the College Republicans before becoming a Democrat in 1968. Rick Perry switched from Democrat to Republican in 1989. Elizabeth Warren switched from Republican to Democrat in 1996. These examples illustrate the great importance of the political parties as a trustworthy sign of what a politician really believes.
But political parties serve an even more important role: they tell us who we should reflexively hate. Without political parties, voters would be forced to evaluate politicians based on the results of their policies instead mindlessly rooting for their team. Chaos would inevitably ensue.
And don't get me started about 3rd parties. You shouldn't vote for them because they won't get enough votes. Circular logic is fun because circular logic is fun!
This country has a two-party system. It says so right in the Constitution. I think it's between the part that talks about the separation of church and state and the part that says only people in a well-regulated militia are allowed to have guns.
Here's how it works: if you vote and your candidate wins, your vote is an implicit agreement to whatever happens next. And if you vote for someone else and they lose, you agree to bound by the decision of the majority by participating in the election. And if you don't vote, you have no right to complain because the only legitimate form of protest is to vote. So you agree to whatever politicians do whether you vote or not. This is called "consent of the governed". It's one of those phrases like "living dead" or "quiet riot" that sounds funny if you think about it too much
My advice is to only vote for flip-floppers. It's the safest bet because statistically speaking, you'll get what you want about half the time.
But political parties serve an even more important role: they tell us who we should reflexively hate. Without political parties, voters would be forced to evaluate politicians based on the results of their policies instead mindlessly rooting for their team. Chaos would inevitably ensue.
And don't get me started about 3rd parties. You shouldn't vote for them because they won't get enough votes. Circular logic is fun because circular logic is fun!
This country has a two-party system. It says so right in the Constitution. I think it's between the part that talks about the separation of church and state and the part that says only people in a well-regulated militia are allowed to have guns.
Here's how it works: if you vote and your candidate wins, your vote is an implicit agreement to whatever happens next. And if you vote for someone else and they lose, you agree to bound by the decision of the majority by participating in the election. And if you don't vote, you have no right to complain because the only legitimate form of protest is to vote. So you agree to whatever politicians do whether you vote or not. This is called "consent of the governed". It's one of those phrases like "living dead" or "quiet riot" that sounds funny if you think about it too much
My advice is to only vote for flip-floppers. It's the safest bet because statistically speaking, you'll get what you want about half the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment